Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Leo Borg vs Sebastian Eriksson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Borg vs Eriksson analysis and find out who is favored!
Leo Borg vs Sebastian Eriksson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Borg 1 - 0 Eriksson
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Borg has won 48.01% of points on their second serve, while Eriksson has won 46.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Borg, in recent form, has won 53.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eriksson has won 54.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.1% and 33.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Borg has saved 55.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eriksson has saved 51.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Borg has won 54.39% of matches played (W/L 31/ 26), with Eriksson winning 33.33% (W/L 8/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Borg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 42/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 3/ 14). Eriksson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Borg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 28/ 12), where as Eriksson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 8/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Borg winning 1 times and Eriksson being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Borg winning 2 and Eriksson winning 0. The last match between Borg and Eriksson was at the M25 Varnamo, 10-05-2023, First, Clay with Leo Borg getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Borg and Eriksson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Borg winning 0 times and Eriksson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Borg winning 0, and Eriksson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Borg has played against opponents with an average rank of 170.95 while Eriksson has played against players with an average rank of 133.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Borg has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eriksson has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Borg has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eriksson has converted 39.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
464
Rank
334
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
50% (84-83)
Career Total W/L
36% (12-21)
50% (8-8)
YTD W/L
35% (6-11)
$9,880
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Leo Borg | Sebastian Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (40/73) | 61% (38/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (25/40) | 53% (20/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (16/33) | 33% (8/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 19% (3/16) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (34/62) | 44% (32/73) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Leo Borg
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Leo Borg | Sebastian Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (8/8) | 35% (6/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (19/18) | 36% (14/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (166/181) | 45% (162/197) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:50 | 1:49:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 176.25 | 151.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (711/1113) | 66% (747/1126) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (444/711) | 60% (449/747) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (193/402) | 46% (176/379) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (52/117) | 39% (52/132) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (464/1138) | 42% (479/1149) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (8/5) | 35% (6/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 35% (6/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 18% (11/2) |
Leo Borg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Corey Craig
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
2
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Gabrielius Guzauskas
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Taym Alazmeh
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Chin
Player
Leo Borg
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Pablo Paternostro
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Leo Borg
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Davide Ferrarolli
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Leo Borg
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Eriksson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Eriksson
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Eriksson
Player
Marino Jakic
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
99)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Eriksson
Player
Gabriel Matuszewski
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vojtech Vales
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Catarina
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Eriksson
Player
Tim Ruehl
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
49%
(
48 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Furlanetto
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Pietri
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Borg Vs Eriksson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
